United States v. Charles A. Johnson & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. For decision below, see 154 Fed. 752, affirming decisions of the Board of United States General Appraisers which had sustained the importers’ protests against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York. • The case involves consideration of the following provisions of Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1 (Schedule J, par. 346; Schedule K, par. 366; and…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. For decision below, see 154 Fed. 752, affirming decisions of the Board of United States General Appraisers which had sustained the importers’ protests against the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of New York. • The case involves consideration of the following provisions of Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1 (Schedule J, par. 346; Schedule K, par. 366; and Schedule L, par. 391, 30 Stat. 181, 184, 187 [U. S. 'Comp. St. 1901, pp. 1663, 1666, 1670]): “346. Woven fabrics * * *…
1Per curiam
The single point in this case has been decided adversely to the government in the Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit (154 Fed. 770); and we see no reason to differ from its conclusion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Bough v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926