Legal Opinion

United States v. Walsh

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 2, 1907No. 702 (1,849)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This case turns on the construction of the proviso which concludes paragraph 391 of the customs act of July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule L, 30 Stat. 187 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1670], which paragraph is as follows:

“391. All manufactures of silk, or of which silk is the component material of chief value, including such as have india-ruhber as a component material, not especially provided for in this act, and all Jacquard figured goods in the piece, made on looms, of which silk is the component material of chief value, dyed in the yarn, and containing two or more…

2Cases cited1 opinion

United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

United States v. Scruggs, Vandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
Ballot v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
United States v. Charles A. Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
Sieber & Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Saugerties Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908