State v. Brindle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and, thus, due process of law. Defendant alleges, first, that his counsel’s failure to object to incompetent testimony from the witness, Sheila Christie, and second, "that his failure to request the trial court to instruct the jury on the defense of accident were errors amounting to a denial of effective assistance of counsel. We find no merit in defendant’s contentions.
Sheila Christie testified that defendant shot Ray Anderson. In response to the prosecutor’s question whether defendant aimed the gun…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- In re M.Z.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022