Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1979PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The orders of the Appellate Division affirming the convictions of defendants Bell and Pritchett should be reversed and the cases remitted for new trial.

There can be no question on review of the record that defendant Pritchett did not have effective assistance of counsel, within the meaning of our holdings in People v Brown (45 NY2d 852) and People v Droz (39 NY2d 457) (see, also, People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). His retained attorney not only failed to request any pretrial hearings, conduct any voir dire of jurors or make any opening statement, but also asserted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. DiazNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Dickeson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. ZaborskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API