Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Moore

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Writ op Error to the Circuit Court of Ogle county; the Hon. James Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This is trespass quare clausum fregit, brought November 4, 1893, by Amos F. Moore, against the Illinois Central Railroad Company. Four pleas—the general isshe, liberum tenementum, five years’ limitation and twenty years’ limitation—were filed to the one count in the declaration. A new assignment of the trespass was made, and the locus in quo as therein described is sufficiently designated, for the purposes of this decision, by indicating it as a strip of land fifty feet wide on the easterly side of and along and adjoining the easterly line of fence along the line of the tracks of the Illinois…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Peoria v. JohnstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. HoughtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kuecken v. VoltzIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McDuffee v. SinnottIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kurz v. BlumeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StickleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Board of Bond Trustees of Special Road & Bridge District No. 1Supreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. KennedyIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API