Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Stickley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
— Action by appellee in ejectment. Appellant filed a general denial. The court found generally for *313appellee and entered judgment accordingly. Appellant claims that its motion for a new trial should have been sustained on the ground that the finding* is not sustained by sufficient evidence.
The case was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. The statement shows that in 1866 Sylvester Miller conveyed to the railway company certain described land. This land the company intended to use for depot purposes, but has not done so. It adjoins the north side of the right of way. In the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Dyer v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. HoughtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Palmer v. DoschIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Illinois Central Railroad v. O'ConnorIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Echterling Et Ux. v. Kalvaitis Et Ux.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Rennert v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. PfostIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Abel v. LoveIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Webb v. RhodesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.