Legal Opinion

Grody v. Scalone

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1950No. 31631PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Plaintiff, John Grody, doing'business ás Modern Furnace Company, brought suit in the circuit court of Cook County against Mary Scalone to recover a balance of $840, which it is alleged was due for the installation of a furnace in defendant’s residence on contract for the agreed sum of $1220. A payment of $380 has been credited on the account. The contract upon which this suit was based recited that the “Modern Furnace Company,” as seller, will install a certain oil furnace, and same is signed by Mary Scalone as buyer, and Modern Furnace Company by John Grody as seller. The defendant filed an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Ashland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Sagal v. FylarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Hayes v. Providence Citizens' Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. People Ex Rel. Power v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mickelson v. KolbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meyer v. BuckmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  2. City of Chicago v. CottonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. White v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. People v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Usher v. McGowanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API