Legal Opinion

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. TEMCO METAL PRODUCTS COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages by the holder of 30 forged checks to recover the loss it incurred after the checks had been stolen during a burglary of defendant’s office and then cashed at several of plaintiff’s stores. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that defendant was negligent (1) in failing to place the blank checks in safekeeping; (2) in failing to place its check “protectograph” in safekeeping; and (3) in failing to lock the “proteetograph” so as to render it unusable.

Plaintiff offered evidence that plaintiff, a large…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kimbler v. StillwellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Torres v. United States National BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Temco Metal Products Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Chicago Heights Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Par Steel Products & Service Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Fifth/Third BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API