Legal Opinion

Temco Metal Products Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for damages by an insured against its insurer for breach of a broad form comprehensive general liability insurance policy. The breach was claimed to have occurred when defendant refused to defend an action brought by a third party against the insured. Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint upon the basis that it did not state a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant which resulted from the sustaining of the demurrer.

Plaintiff’s complaint discloses that in an action brought against it by Fred Meyer, Inc., Meyer sought to recover damages which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. TEMCO METAL PRODUCTS COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lazzara Oil Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Mortgage Bancorporation v. New Hampshire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Coulter v. Cigna Property & Casualty CompaniesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  5. McCollum v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API