Claim of Paly v. Lane Brush Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
This is an appeal by the alleged employer and his insurance carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, which reversed a previous decision of a referee finding no industrial accident and disallowing the claim, and found that the claimant, Harry Paly, sustained accidental injuries on January 6, 1953, while in the employ of the Lane Brush Company.
Appellants contend first that there is no substantial evidence to support the finding that there was an employer-employee relationship between claimant and the Lane Brush Company, and second, that if it he found that there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Claim of Gordon v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Lindenhurst Green & White Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Armstrong v. Liles Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Leo M. And Genevieve B. Rayhill, D/B/A Leo M. Rayhill Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. KaplanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.