Legal Opinion

McClain v. Saranac MacHine Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 2, 1934No. 12,952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as McClain, defendant in error as the Saranac Company, the Colorado Basket Company as the Colorado Company, and Earl E. Sarehet as Sarehet.

The Saranac Company on February 3, 1931, and by leave of court first had, brought replevin against McClain as receiver of the Colorado Company to recover possession of three machines which the former had sold and delivered to the latter on a contract (hereinafter referred to as A) providing that title should remain in the vendor until the purchase price was fully paid. McClain defended on the ground of a deed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rossi v. Colorado Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. Bogdon v. FortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Beatrice Creamery Co. v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Co. v. ParrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Indian Creek Coal Mining Co. v. Home Savings & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allan v. Diamond T Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
  2. Good Shepherd Health Facilities of Colorado, Inc. v. Department of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Allan v. Diamond T Motor Car CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API