Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Co. v. Parry
Supreme Court of Colorado
^tppeal from the District Court of the City and Cov/nty of Denver. Don. Samuel L. Carpenter, Judge. Action by Tbe Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Company against The Crown Point & Virginia Gold Mining Company, in which Samuel Hyman and Joseph Hiller, as copartners under the name of Hyman & Hiller, intervened; and, upon motion of plaintiff and intervenors, S. A. Josephi was appointed receiver, subsequently removed by the court, and Michael Spangler was appointed, who served…
Read the full summary
^tppeal from the District Court of the City and Cov/nty of Denver. Don. Samuel L. Carpenter, Judge. Action by Tbe Hendrie & Bolthoff Manufacturing Company against The Crown Point & Virginia Gold Mining Company, in which Samuel Hyman and Joseph Hiller, as copartners under the name of Hyman & Hiller, intervened; and, upon motion of plaintiff and intervenors, S. A. Josephi was appointed receiver, subsequently removed by the court, and Michael Spangler was appointed, who served until killed, and the court thereupon appointed A. B. McGaffey. Thereafter Sarah Parry, Sarah Ann Parry, as executrix of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell
This controversy, concerning expenses incurred by a receiver, is between a plaintiff who secured his appointment, and the assignees of those who furnished supplies to, and performed labor for, him.
In an action brought in the district court of Arapahoe county by appellant, the Hendrie & Bolt*362lioff company, as a judgment .creditor, against The Crown Point & Virginia G-old Mining Company, the judgment debtor, in which Samuel Hyman and Jonas Hiller, as minority stockholders of the defendant company, intervened, the court, upon the request both of the plaintiff and the intervenors, appointed S. A.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- St. Louis, Kennett & Southern Railroad v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Highley v. DeaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- French v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Radford v. FolsomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ebel v. Ebel (In Re Ebel)District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Hart v. Ed-Ley Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
- Zeligman v. JuergensColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nationsbank of Georgia v. Conifer Asset Management Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- McClain v. Saranac MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.