Legal Opinion

Greenpeace v. National Marine Fisheries Service

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided July 19, 2000No. C98-492ZPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ZILLY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands region (BSAI), collectively referred to as the North Pacific ecosystem, is home to the largest commercial fishery in the United States. The ecosystem is also home to the western Steller sea lion, which in 1990 was listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as a threatened species and in 1997 was classified as endangered. Greenpeace, American Oceans Campaign, and the Sierra Club (plaintiffs) contend the North Pacific groundfish trawl fisheries are harmful to the endangered Steller sea lion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. American Rivers v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Arizona Cattle Growers' Association v. United States Fish And WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
  5. Greenpeace Foundation v. MinetaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API