Legal Opinion

Quaker State Oil Co. v. Taskinen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 1997No. 93-10255; CA A87486Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

In this medical services dispute, petitioners seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held that claimant’s medical services claim for proposed low back surgery was appropriate and that claimant’s counsel was entitled to attorney fees. We reverse and remand to the Board with instructions to vacate the Board’s order and remand to the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services1 (Director) for further proceedings.

This medical services dispute concerns the appropriateness of a ninth surgery on claimant’s spine. The employer challenged this procedure and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Jefferson v. Sam's CafeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Baar v. Fairview Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API