Legal Opinion

Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1994No. WCB 90-17616; CA A73922; SC S40768PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board correctly declined to exercise jurisdiction over a claim for future medical treatment. The Board held that, under ORS 656.704(3), a claim for future medical treatment is not a matter concerning a claim that the Board may address, because it is subject to the jurisdiction of the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance 1 under ORS 656.327(l)(a).

On judicial review, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the Board is authorized to resolve a claim for proposed medical treatment and remanded the case for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Morris v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Newell v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Vaccaro v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Newell v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. SAIF Corp. v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API