Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
The issue in this case is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board correctly declined to exercise jurisdiction over a claim for future medical treatment. The Board held that, under ORS 656.704(3), a claim for future medical treatment is not a matter concerning a claim that the Board may address, because it is subject to the jurisdiction of the Director of the Department of Insurance and Finance 1 under ORS 656.327(l)(a).
On judicial review, the Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the Board is authorized to resolve a claim for proposed medical treatment and remanded the case for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martin v. City of AlbanyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Niccum v. Southcoast Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morris v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Newell v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Vaccaro v. City of OmahaNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- Newell v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- SAIF Corp. v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.