Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Parker v. Konopka

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1963No. 5415PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunsicker, P. J.

Murray S. Parker, as relator, filed an original action in this court, praying for a writ of mandamus to issue directing the Superintendent of Building Inspection and Regulation Division of the Department of Public Safety of the city of Akron, to issue to him a building permit to remodel and use a structure on real estate owned by relator for occupancy by three families.

Murray S. Parker, the relator, owns improved real estate at 24 Grand Avenue, Akron, Ohio, which property is now zoned for use as a two-family dwelling. Relator wishes to remodel this property for use as a three-family residence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. L. & M. Investment Co. v. CutlerOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Redford Moving & Storage Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cohn v. County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. State, Ex Rel. Cook v. TurgeonOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Hickerson v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Pittsburgh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. Fox v. Shriver-AllisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Wentworth Hotel, Inc. v. Town of New CastleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API