Legal Opinion

Westly v. U. S. Bancorp

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 2003No. C042315, C042758PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

In this consolidated appeal, Steve Westly, as state Controller (the Controller), 1 appeals from the judgments entered after the trial court granted the defendants’, Allstate Insurance Company et al. (Allstate) and U.S. Bancorp, et al. (U.S. Bancorp), motions for summary judgment based upon Code of Civil Procedure section 1577.5. 2

Section 1577.5 grants amnesty from the interest charges that otherwise would be imposed on the holders of escheated property who fail to deliver the property to the state in a timely manner, if the “property [is] paid or delivered to the Controller…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Estate of SkinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. City of Azusa v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. KAUFMAN & BROAD v. Performance PlasteringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API