Reforestacion de Sarapiqui v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
Introduction
Plaintiff1 filed a complaint against the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC),2 a United States Government agency, under a perceived breach of contract theory. A thorough analysis of plaintiff’s argument, however, demonstrates that the substance of its claim is essentially one for misrepresentation, i.e., a tort, against the government. In opposition thereto, on January 2, 1991, there was filed Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, For Summary Judgment. Because of the strict jurisdictional requirements of this court, which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Jiron v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.