VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, L.L.C. v. INCO LIMITED
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, LLC, Civil No.: 2:18-cv-15021 (KSH) (CLW) Plaintiff, v. INCO LIMITED, n/k/a VALE CANADA LIMITED, OPIN ION Defendant. Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J. I. Introduction Plaintiff Viridian Resources LLC’s (“Viridian”) owns “phytomining” technology, a process that uses plants to extract metals from soil. Beginning in 1995, Viridian and defendant Inco Limited, n/k/a Vale Canada Limited (“Vale”), which owns mining rights overseas, explored ways by which Vale’s mining operations could incorporate Viridian’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.