Legal Opinion

VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, L.L.C. v. INCO LIMITED

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 7, 2023No. 2:18-cv-15021Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VIRIDIAN RESOURCES, LLC, Civil No.: 2:18-cv-15021 (KSH) (CLW) Plaintiff, v. INCO LIMITED, n/k/a VALE CANADA LIMITED, OPIN ION Defendant. Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J. I. Introduction Plaintiff Viridian Resources LLC’s (“Viridian”) owns “phytomining” technology, a process that uses plants to extract metals from soil. Beginning in 1995, Viridian and defendant Inco Limited, n/k/a Vale Canada Limited (“Vale”), which owns mining rights overseas, explored ways by which Vale’s mining operations could incorporate Viridian’s…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API