Legal Opinion
McBride v. Heckler
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 22, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-4176PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
This case is before me under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), .to review the final determination of the Secretary denying plaintiff the surviving child’s benefits which she is seeking. Plaintiff has exhausted the administrative channels, and this case is properly before me for review. The AU determined that the plaintiff, Yvonne McBride, an infant, is not a “child” for the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(2)(A) or (B) or 42 U.S.C. 416(h)(3)(C). This finding for reason stated infra was not based on substantial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Trimble v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Patricia KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- T.W. v. A.W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Morales v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Brown for Brown v. BowenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Sherilyn M. YOUNGER, on Behalf of Tia R. and Kia L. YOUNGER, Minors, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.