Legal Opinion

State v. Nunez-Vazquez

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 25, 2020No. 20160794-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2020 UT App 98

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. JAMIE ERNESTO NUNEZ-VASQUEZ, Appellant. Opinion No. 20160794-CA Filed June 25, 2020 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Mark S. Kouris No. 141900845 Nathalie S. Skibine, Attorney for Appellant Sean D. Reyes and John J. Nielsen, Attorneys for Appellee JUDGE MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES GREGORY K. ORME and DAVID N. MORTENSEN concurred. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER, Judge: ¶1 Jamie Ernesto Nunez-Vasquez (Defendant) challenges his conviction for forcible sodomy. With respect…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WhitchurchCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  2. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  3. West Valley v. DrawnCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  4. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. State v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API