Legal Opinion
In Re Champlain Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 14, 2004No. 03-111PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. Appellant, Champlain Oil Company, Inc., appeals
from.an order of the environmental court granting appellee, R.L. Vallee, Inc.’s, motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Champlain’s proposed site usage was illegal and should not have been permitted by the Town of Colchester’s planning commission. Champlain argues that the environmental court erred by 1) deciding the case based on a legal theory that Vallee did not raise at the planning commission level and 2) concluding that Champlain did not file the proper application in time to vest rights of review under then existing zoning…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- In Re Appeal of Taft Corners Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Limoge v. People's Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- In Re Appeal of JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Appeal of CarrollSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- In re Appeal of CarrollSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Berge v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. and Timberlake Associates, LLP, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Appeal of HardyVermont Superior Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.