Legal Opinion
In Re Appeal of Jackson
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 9, 2003No. 02-236PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. This case arises from the modification of a bam, sited within the setback distance from a watercourse under zoning of the Town of Waitsfield (the Town), and owned by Ira and Martha Jackson (the Jacksons). The bam modification was initially permitted by the Town, but the owners added another floor to the modified bam without seeking an amendment to the permit. After the Town Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) refused to issue a permit for the expanded bam, and ordered that the upper story be removed, the environmental court reversed the standard used by the ZBA allowed the owners to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Springfield Hydroelectric Co. v. CoppSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- City of South Burlington v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Appeal of McEwing Services, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re Appeal of Wesco, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Appeal of CurtisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- In re Appeal of SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.