Legal Opinion
American Security Bank, N. A. v. John Y. Harrison Realty, Inc., and Walter T. Charlton
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 12, 1982No. 80-2326PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
This case presents a narrow procedural problem concerning the kinds of motions that toll the running of the 30-day period within which litigants in the district court must notice their appeals. See Fed.R. App.P. 4. This court and others previously have made it clear that a motion to reconsider a motion for a new trial is not itself a motion for a new trial, and is therefore insufficient to toll the running of the time period in which to file a notice of appeal. Since the timeliness of the notice of appeal is jurisdictional, we are not permitted to review the merits of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brian Atwood Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., Inc. v. W. R. Bean & Son, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Boaz v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Marten v. HessCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Turner v. EversCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Gleb Glinka v. Maytag CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Greater Houston Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union v. Robert EckelsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.