In re Ziegler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by David B. Siclcels, as receiver of the Harlem River Bank, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term an'd entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 5tli day of July, 1904, authorizing the applicant, Sarah Ziegler, to file her claim against the Harlem River Bank with the receiver of the bank, and also appointing a referee to take proof ®f the claim of the applicant against such bank.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
The Harlem River Bank failed, and in an action brought on behalf ®f the People for a dissolution of the corporation, David B. Siekels was appointed permanent receiver and duly qualified as such. At the time of the failure the applicant was a depositor in the bank, and there stood upon its books to her credit $1,011.39. Her claim to this amount was duly proved before the receiver, and she was paid her proportionate share of the funds which came into the receiver’s hands.
About October 27, 1898, and while Siekels was acting as receiver *119of the bank, John E. Ilagmayer, suing on his ov/n…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kerr v. . BlodgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Lang v. LutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by7 opinions
- North American Co. v. St. Louis &. S. F. R.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1922
- Ford v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Buzzell v. Aetna Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- First National Bank v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Nicholas v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.