Legal Opinion

Gale v. Corey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1887No. 12,925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was a suit by the appellants against Andrew F. Corey to recover upon three promissory notes. The only matter in controversy is the right of the appellants to recover interest on the notes after they matured.

The facts are embodied in a special finding of facts by the court. So far as material to be stated, they are as follows: On the 12th day of March, 1868, in order to effect a family settlement between himself and his brothers and sister, and presumably to adjust and equalize, certain advancements made by his father, the appellee, Andrew F. Corey, executed the notes in suit, payable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Insurance v. GouldIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Holzman v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Frazer v. BossIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Brown v. Railway Passenger Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. King v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. Citizens Gas Co. of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Davis v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hamilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Robertson v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API