Legal Opinion
United States v. Chelsea Towers, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 27, 1967No. Civ. 1083-67PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, District Judge:
On October 27, 1967 the plaintiff, United States of America, instituted this mortgage foreclosure action for default of the defendant, Chelsea Towers, Inc. (Chelsea), regarding a 156 unit cooperative apartment building in Atlantic City, New Jersey, constructed under the provisions of Title 2, section 213, of the National Housing Act. 1 Plaintiff moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C. Defendant cross moves both for a stay of this action, pending determination of another action referred to hereinafter, and to join, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Irwin H. Lawhorn v. The Atlantic Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Harvey Blumenthal, Doing Business as Harvey Peters, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Choy v. Farragut Gardens 1, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Lesser v. StrubbeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Somali Development Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- United States v. Winthrop Towers, a Limited Partnership, and Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company as Trustee Under Trust 1037Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- John Arthur Wager v. Maynard J. ProCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Berk & BerkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.