Legal Opinion

Amato & Stella Associates, Inc. v. Florida North Investments, Ltd.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 5, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-90-JRRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a real estate brokerage firm, brings this action to recover a commission of $125,000 from defendant. Plaintiff claims that, pursuant to a listing agreement it had with defendant, plaintiff provided a ready, willing, and able buyer for defendant’s Colonial Village Apartments complex. Defendant moves for summary judgment on the grounds that oral listing agreements cannot be enforced in Delaware and that, if a written listing agreement existed, its terms were not met. Plaintiff rejects that legal characterization of oral listing agreements, alternatively…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Lock v. SchrepplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
  4. Milholin v. VorhiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Green Mountain Realty, Inc. v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. PainoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  2. Petrosky v. PetersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  3. Eastern Commercial Realty Corp. v. FuscoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. DowBrands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API