Petrosky v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice.
In this appeal, we consider whether a real estate broker should be compensated for services performed in obtaining a long-term lease when the broker’s listing agreement addressed only a sale of the property in question. The Superior Court held that, because a Delaware Real Estate Commission regulation requires all listing agreements to be in writing, the broker could not recover under a claim that the parties orally modified the agreement, or quantum meruit. We disagree. Under the facts of this case, where the long-term lease expressly recognizes the broker’s entitlement to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eastern Commercial Realty Corp. v. FuscoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Amato & Stella Associates, Inc. v. Florida North Investments, Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
3Cited by19 opinions
- Advanced Paving Services, LLC v. Metra Industries, Inc. v. Artesian Water Co., Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2026
- Atlantic Basin Refining, Inc. v. JP Energy Partners, LPDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2018
- Carbon Crest LLC v. Tencue Productions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Cellular Telephone Company Litigation casesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2024
- Edgar v. Troy Holdings, IncSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.