Legal Opinion

Eastern Commercial Realty Corp. v. Fusco

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 3, 1995No. 43, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTNETT, Justice.

In this appeal we affirm the Superior Court’s holding that Regulation IX.A of the Delaware Real Estate Commission bars any recovery for a payment based on an oral agreement to pay a commission or finder’s fee in connection with a real estate transaction. We also affirm the Superior Court’s refusal to permit an amendment to the complaint to assert a belated claim of fraud.

I

On August 17, 1993, the Superior Court granted the motion for summary judgment of the Defendants-Below, but gave plaintiffs leave to seek to amend the complaint. On November 9,1993, the Superior Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Bokat v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  5. Lock v. SchrepplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Petrosky v. PetersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  4. Webber v. ANDERSON HOMES LLC.Superior Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. 913 Market, LLC v. InvestUSA Holding Enterprises, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API