Eastern Commercial Realty Corp. v. Fusco
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Justice.
In this appeal we affirm the Superior Court’s holding that Regulation IX.A of the Delaware Real Estate Commission bars any recovery for a payment based on an oral agreement to pay a commission or finder’s fee in connection with a real estate transaction. We also affirm the Superior Court’s refusal to permit an amendment to the complaint to assert a belated claim of fraud.
I
On August 17, 1993, the Superior Court granted the motion for summary judgment of the Defendants-Below, but gave plaintiffs leave to seek to amend the complaint. On November 9,1993, the Superior Court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Merrill v. Crothall-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Bokat v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Lock v. SchrepplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Petrosky v. PetersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Webber v. ANDERSON HOMES LLC.Superior Court of Delaware · 2006
- 913 Market, LLC v. InvestUSA Holding Enterprises, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.