Legal Opinion
Rosenblum v. Dingfelder
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 7, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
The defendants seek twofold relief. First, an order directing plaintiff to serve a verified bill of particulars of certain matters alleged in the complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and second, for an order requiring the plaintiff to produce certain documents for the inspection of the defendants’ attorney and for permission to make copies of such documents pursuant to Rule 34 of the aforementioned rules.
The complaint, charging the defendants w-ith fraud and conspiracy, was served on March…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tully v. HowardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. MASONIC HOSP. ASS'N OF PAYNE CTY.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1961
- Dreskin v. ZinkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Pyramid Life Insurance v. Masonic Hospital Ass'n of Payne CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1961
- Daniel Saldana v. Martha DonovanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025