Legal Opinion
Raudenbush v. Reading Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 23, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 9218PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
This case was listed for jury trial on Monday, February 13, 1950 before me. By agreement of counsel, the case was continued to February 27th, 1950, and a jury has been selected, but not sworn, to try(the action. On Tuesday, February 21st, a motion was presented to the Court under Rule 34 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to compel the defendant to make available for copying:
1. A statement given by the plaintiff to the claims agent of the defendant approximately one month after the happening of the accident which is the subject matter of this suit and at a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Blank v. Great Northern Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1943
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hudalla v. Chicago, M., S. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Burns v. MulderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Irvine v. Safeway Trails, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Shupe v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Diniero v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.