Legal Opinion
Blank v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1943No. 395PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff makes this application under Rule 34 for leave to inspect and copy the transcript of reporter’s notes of a statement made by the plaintiff to the Claim Agent of the defendant Railway Company some few days after the accident.
It appears by the affidavit of A. L. Janes, one of the attorneys for the defendant, that this statement is now in the hands of the attorneys for the Railway Company.
The defendant objects to the demand made by the plaintiff on the grounds (1) that he has failed to show good cause therefor; (2) that the statement is privileged, and (3)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Mackerer v. New York Cent. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- Swanson v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Hudalla v. Chicago, M., S. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Hanson v. Gartland Steamship Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.