Legal Opinion

United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 17, 1964No. 4-63 Civ. 336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.

The case consists of two causes of action based upon the charge that two of defendant’s employees were required to be on duty for a period longer than nine hours out .of twenty-four in violation of 45 U.S.C. § 62, which reads,

“It shall be unlawful for any common carrier, its officers, or agents, subject to sections 61-64 of this title to require or permit any employees subject to said sections to be or re*89main on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours, and whenever any such employee of such common carrier shall have been continuously on duty for sixteen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Delano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  2. Oregon Short Line R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  4. United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
  5. United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API