Legal Opinion

Earney v. Sharp

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1993No. 92-886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is a second appeal and, like the first, involves the sufficiency of the proof of attestation of a will. When the case came before us initially, we held the probate judge had erred in admitting a will to probate without the testimony of two attesting witnesses. See in the Matter of the Estate of Sharp, 306 Ark. 268, 810 S.W.2d 952 (1991). The order was reversed and the case was remanded to the probate court for further proceedings.

On remand, the proponents of the will, over the objection of the contestants, undertook to present further evidence of attestation and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Milsap v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. In re Estate of SharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Nash v. ESTATE OF SWAFFERSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Putman v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API