Legal Opinion

Massongill v. County of Scott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1999No. 98-807PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

Appellant Doyle Massongill brings this second appeal from his 1995 complaint filed against Scott County, the county judge, and the members of the Quorum Court alleging illegal exaction and challenging the validity of two statutes: Ordinance 92-3, which provided for a solid-waste collection and disposal fee, and Ordinance 96-3, which provided Quorum Court members with health insurance benefits as additional compensation for their duties as justices of the peace. On first appeal to this court, we held that Ordinance 96-3 and its precursor, Ordinance 95-3, were invalid as…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. MacKey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Starnes v. SadlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Burke v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Worth v. City of RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Post v. State v. State v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API