Legal Opinion
Electrical Research Products, Inc. v. Haniotis Bros.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 18, 1934No. 23338PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILD, J.
This is an action to recover payments due under a contract for license to use a certain sotind equipment in a theater and for parts and supplies furnished in said equipment in accordance with said contract.
Plaintiff in error, being the plaintiff in the trial court, on July 3, 1929, contracted with the defendants, Haniotis Brothers,' a copartnership, for the installation and use of a Western Electric Sound Reproducing Equipment in their theater at Okmulgee. Under the terms of the contract, which was referred to as a grant of license and installation of equipment, and also as a nonexclusive and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Electrical Products Corp. v. MoskoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- Standard Oil Co. v. DolginSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Crittenden v. St. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Warth v. MackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Uptegraft v. Dome Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Anthony Arcese v. Daniel Schmitt & CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Crane v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Gypsy Oil Co. v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.