Legal Opinion

Bowley v. Mangrum & Otter

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1906No. Civ. No. 168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Jesse W. Lilienthal, and H. Gr. W. Dinkelspiel, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an action brought by Patrick Kelly for damages for injuries to his person, alleged to have been caused by the negligent opening by defendant of double iron doors in the sidewalk and over an elevator shaft under the sidewalk, whereby plaintiff was violently thrown against the sidewalk, and his ribs fractured and his person otherwise injured. Plaintiff secured a verdict, and the defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial. Kelly has died since the trial, and the administrator of his estate has been substituted as plaintiff, but when we refer to the plaintiff in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Barry v. TerkildsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Rider v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Vaca Valley & Clear Lake Railroad v. MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Du Val v. Boos Bros. Cafeteria Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Smith v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. State Bank v. MartySupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Donovan v. KemperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API