Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
James T. Seach (Seach) appeals from the entry of a permanent injunction and a damage award in favor of his former employer, Richards, Dieterle & Co. (the Firm) alleging, inter alia, that a covenant not to compete which does not contain a geographic limitation is void, that the terms “any present, past or prospective client” are too broad and therefore void, that a liquidated damage clause calling for excessive damages is void as a penalty, that the attorney fees awarded were not supported by the evidence, and that certain trial court findings were erroneous.
We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
- Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
- American Welding & Engineering Co. v. LuebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Welcome Wagon, Inc. v. HaschertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
- Gill v. Computer Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. HaassTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- In the Matter of Barry Stuart Udell, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of the Standard Carpetland Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Harvest Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Inter-Ocean Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.