Legal Opinion

Dicen v. New Sesco, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2005No. 55S01-0409-CV-407PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The founders and owners of an ongoing business took in new investors and formed a successor corporation. They agreed to stay on for three years and not to compete for two years after that. We hold that such promises not to compete should be enforced on a more liberal basis than the skeptical one courts use regarding contracts between employer and employee.

Facts and Procedural History

After seven years as employees of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM"), Michael Dicen, David Hughes, and David Valinetz left their positions in 1996 to form their own…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Young v. Van ZandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Hinkel v. Sataria Distribution & Packaging, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Clark's Sales and Service, Inc v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. MacGill v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API