Legal Opinion

Noll v. Ritzer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2016No. Docket 328131PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoonstra, J.

In this case regarding the abandonment of a vehicle, respondent appeals as on leave granted 1 the circuit court’s order affirming the district court’s ruling that petitioner was not required to post a bond under MCL 257.252a in order to proceed with an abandoned-vehicle hearing when petitioner was not seeking release of the vehicle before the hearing. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, and we direct the circuit court to vacate the district court’s order.

I. PERTINENT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner sold a motorcycle to a third party for cash, but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mayor of Lansing v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Ford Motor Company v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Apsey v. Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Charter Township of York v. Donald MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Christie Deruiter v. Township of ByronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. J & T TowingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Charter Township of York v. Donald MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Christie Deruiter v. Township of ByronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API