Legal Opinion

Higgins v. . Higgins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

This was a proceeding for partition of land, begun before tbe clerk. Two of tbe defendants pleaded sole seizin and tbe other .defendants filed no answer. Tbe case was then transferred to tbe court at term. Tbe proceeding thereby became in- effect an action of ejectment. Ditmore v. Rexford, 165 N. C., 620.

Tbe-plaintiffs alleged tbat J. N. Higgins died seized of a certain tract of land in Yancey County, leaving them and tbe defendants as bis heirs at law, and tbat they desired to bold tbeir interests in said land in severalty, and prayed tbat said lands be partitioned among tbe plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Jones v. . CohenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Alley v. Howell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Fitzgerald v. . SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Toler v. . FrenchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API