Almy v. Pappas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to compel infant plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial and in granting plaintiffs’ cross motion for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103. There is no question that the testimony of the infant plaintiff, *947who was seven years old at the time her testimony was sought, would properly be discoverable if she is competent (CPLR 3101 [a]). Defendant has exhausted other available sources of information and it appears that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tuohy v. GaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Muscoreil v. Pool Mart, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rembert v. LipshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by2 opinions
- Claim of Brian VV. v. Chenango Forks Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Dufresne-Simmons v. Wingate, Russotti & Shapiro, LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2016