Legal Opinion

Almy v. Pappas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant’s motion granted. Memorandum: Special Term abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to compel infant plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial and in granting plaintiffs’ cross motion for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103. There is no question that the testimony of the infant plaintiff, *947who was seven years old at the time her testimony was sought, would properly be discoverable if she is competent (CPLR 3101 [a]). Defendant has exhausted other available sources of information and it appears that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuohy v. GaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Muscoreil v. Pool Mart, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Rembert v. LipshutzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Brian VV. v. Chenango Forks Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Dufresne-Simmons v. Wingate, Russotti & Shapiro, LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API