Legal Opinion

Ford v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 1987No. 86-123PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The trial court granted appellee’s motion for a summary judgment on his complaint for contribution from a joint tortfeasor. Judgment was granted after pleadings and affidavits were filed and depositions taken. The appellee had settled a suit against three alleged joint tortfeasors and had taken a release in favor of all three defendants. The appellant argues on appeal that the court erred in finding that as a matter of law he was liable for contribution pursuant to Arkansas Stat. Ann. § 34-1002 (Repl. 1962). We agree and hold that there was a genuine issue as to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Gastroenterology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Leigh Winham, Inc. v. Reynolds Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Young v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Township Builders, Inc. v. Kraus Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Joey Brown Interest, Inc. v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. LovellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Gann v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Scully v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Hilton v. Pine Bluff Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Bennett v. TroutSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API