Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. Lovell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1988No. 88-67PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, attorney R.C. Pinkston, Jr., brought an action for slander against the appellee, attorney John F. Lovell, Jr. This appeal is from an order dismissing Pinkston’s suit on motion for summary judgment by Lovell. On appeal, Pinkston contends the court erred: (1) in denying his request for a continuance; (2) in failing to recuse; (3) in granting Lovell’s motion for summary judgment; and (4) in concluding that certain documents would be inadmissible at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment. We find no error and affirm.

The suit by Pinkston…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Selby v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Ford v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Sloss v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bushong v. Garman Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Robertson Oil Company, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  3. South County, Inc. v. First Western Loan Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Wyatt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API