Legal Opinion

Hilton v. Pine Bluff Public Schools

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1988No. 87-334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

This case involves the responsibility of a school district, when merging with another district, to honor the teaching contracts of the dissolved district. Jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 29(1 )(c).

Appellants Lillie Hilton and Geneva Eatmon, nonprobationary teachers in the Linwood School District, and appellants Jerusha Hobbs, Shirley Kearney, and Verna Scrubbs, probationary teachers in the district, contracted to teach in the district for the 1983-1984 school year. In the 1983-1984 school year, Linwood and the appellee, the Pine Bluff School District…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Grove School District v. StrainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Marion County Rural School District No. 1 v. RastleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Ford v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Chidester School District No. 50 v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  5. Horsman v. Tokio School District No. 82Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Hot Springs Advertising v. ColeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API