United Transportation Union v. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
At issue is whether the Defendant railroad is required to engage in nationwide, multi-employer collective bargaining or whether the railroad can bargain on its own behalf at the local level. We find that the Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Company is not required to engage in nationwide handling of the wage and rules proposals that are in dispute.
This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. (As both sides have submitted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alton & Southern Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1995