Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chacon v. State

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 1975No. 1957Published

1DissentSutin, Judge

A. Rule 93 relief was erroneously denied.

Defendant filed a motion for Rule 93 relief, § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 4). Defendant requested the court to direct the State to disclose any documents in its possession or control material to the defense. A hearing was held. It disclosed a written statement by Mary Gayton and a supplementary report by a detective in the Sheriff’s department. The trial court entered an order “that the Defendant’s motion is denied.” In its comments after the hearing, the trial court stated:

[Tjhere’s been no showing of any deliberate suppression or use of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ChambersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ellis v. ParmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Stone v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Salazar v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API