Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Alvarez

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 22, 2011No. SC 18513PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

This appeal requires us to determine whether the trial court properly struck from the record as a sanction for a discovery violation an offer of compromise that had not been accepted within the statutory period under General Statutes § 52-192a. The plaintiff, Donna Yeager, 1 appeals 2 from the judgment of the trial court, challenging its decisions granting the pretrial motion of the defendants, Maria Alvarez and Benito Alvarez, 3 to strike the offer of compromise and denying the plaintiffs posttrial motion for interest after the jury returned a verdict in her favor in an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Briggs v. McWeenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yeager v. AlvarezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  2. Faile v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  3. Ridgaway v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Alpha Beta Capital Partners, L.P. v. Pursuit Investment Management, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  5. Anderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API