Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Maresh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 1990No. A8610-06137; CA A49253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

After our decision in this case, Cooper v. Maresh, 98 Or App 371, 779 P2d 200, rev den 308 Or 592 (1989), respondents Maresh and Broadway Cab Cooperative (Broadway) separately petitioned for attorney fees. We allow attorney fees to both respondents.1

Maresh requests fees pursuant to the contract between him and plaintiff, which expressly permits recovery of attorney fees on appeal. He also asks for fees pursuant to ORS 20.105.2 Under either the contract or the statute, Maresh is entitled only to reasonable attorney fees, ORCP 68A(1); consequently, the amount awarded under either authority…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Hartford Insurance GroupOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cooper v. MareshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Tyler v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Soga v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API